Speaking to the media for the first time since Qatar has come under repeated missile and drone attacks, the prime minister told Sky News that the country had entered what he called "a very difficult period" - but praised the professionalism of its defence and security forces.
For a man who has mediated some of the world's most complex crises, what stood out to me was how angry he was about Iran's actions.
"It is a big sense of betrayal," he told me. "Just an hour after the start of the war, Qatar and other Gulf countries have been attacked. We made clear that we were not going to take part in any wars against our neighbours."
Iran war latest: Trump and Starmer speak on the phone
For a country that has long kept diplomatic channels open with Tehran - even during the most volatile moments - the tone was striking.
Qatar has traditionally positioned itself as a global mediator, able to speak to everyone. That relationship with Tehran now appears strained.
"All the attacks on the Gulf countries - we never expected this from our neighbour," he said. "We have always tried to preserve a good relationship with Iran, but the justifications and pretexts they are using are completely rejected."
Yet even as he condemned the strikes, the prime minister repeatedly stressed that military escalation would only deepen the crisis - and that the responsibility to step back lies with all sides.
"We continue to seek de-escalation," he said. "They are our neighbours - it's our destiny."
Read more:
Lib Dem leader calls for King's US state visit to be cancelled
Sky reports from scene of large explosion in central Israel
His message was directed not only at Tehran. He also called on the US to reduce tensions, warning of the risk that the entire region slides into war.
Diplomacy, he argued, remains the only viable path out of the crisis.
"The miscalculation by the Iranians to attack Gulf countries has destroyed everything," he said, but insisted the answer now must be renewed negotiations.
He also pushed back against claims that Iran's strikes were aimed at military targets.
International airports, water utilities and gas infrastructure have all been in Tehran's crosshairs.
The prime minister added: "25% of the attacks are targeting civilian facilities. What has this got to do with the war? What do they want to achieve?"
Over and over again, he returned to the global stakes - and that what happens in the Gulf won't stay in the Gulf.
Qatar supplies roughly 20% of the world's gas and is one of the planet's largest fertiliser producers - meaning any sustained disruption would impact markets, food supplies and people worldwide.
Even as the Gulf states insist this is not their fight, however, they are an integral aspect of it.
And that, perhaps, is the central danger of this moment - a war that began between the US, Israel and Iran is now dragging in countries that want no part of it, but increasingly find themselves on its front lines.
General Sir Richard Barrons told Sky News this meant politicians would have to make "very difficult choices" to shift investment away from peacetime priorities such as health and welfare but that - following the eruption of war between the US and Israel against Iran - the world has become even more dangerous than when his review was published last June.
The Ministry of Defence has faced questions about how ready it is for conflict after failing to be able to deploy a single warship rapidly from Portsmouth to bolster the defences of two British sovereign bases in Cyprus, amid threats from Iranian missile and drone strikes.
HMS Dragon, a Type 45 destroyer - the only piece of kit in the British arsenal capable of shooting down ballistic missiles - will only depart for the eastern Mediterranean in the coming days, at least a week since Sir Keir Starmer announced the deployment.
By contrast, the Royal Navy was able to rush two aircraft carriers and multiple other warships from the UK within three days of Argentina invading the Falklands in 1982.
General Barrons said the Strategic Defence Review, which set out how to rebuild the UK's hollowed-out armed forces after decades of decline, recognised "that we live in a much more threatening world, where the risks to the UK are potentially existential".
It recommended the need to invest more in defence, while also being mindful that this would involve "some very difficult choices" about what areas of public spending would have to suffer as a result.
"The world since the review was published has just got more difficult, so the urgency is greater," the former senior military officer said.
"The government is going to have to find more money sooner ... If we don't, then we could feel like the people in Dubai and Bahrain ... and Kyiv."
Iran's retaliation to US and Israeli strikes has included waves of missiles and drones fired at neighbouring Gulf states, while Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has subjected the entire country to deadly bombardments for more than four years.
"We need to do a much better job of being able to deter that [kind of threat] and see it off if it happens," General Barrons said.
Read more:
Iran war: Oil suffers biggest one-day gain in six years
Keir Starmer 'learning lessons from Iraq'
As set out in a Sky News and Tortoise podcast series called The Wargame, successive British governments took what was called a "peace dividend" after the Cold War ended in 1991, switching money out of defence and into areas such as health, welfare and the economy.
The move saw the size of the Royal Navy, army and Royal Air Force shrink significantly along with wider national resilience.
To give a sense of what has been lost, Sky News tracked the decline of the regular military from 1983 - a year after the Falklands War, when NATO allies were still maintaining large standing armed forces to face off against the then Soviet Union - and now.
In 1983, Britain had 321,000 full-time service personnel, split between 72,000 in the navy, 159,000 in the army and 90,000 in the air force.
Two decades later, long after the Cold War had ended but when the UK joined the US in invading Iraq under then Prime Minister Tony Blair, the nation had 207,000 service personnel, with 42,000 in the navy, 112,000 in the army and 53,000 in the RAF.
The latest data released by the Ministry of Defence for last year, however, show these figures now stand at 125,680 members of the full-time armed forces, comprising 27,820 in the navy, 70,300 in the army and 27,560 in the RAF.
Spending on defence as a proportion of GDP has shrunk as well, with Britain allocating 5% for the military in 1983, compared with 2.5% in 2003 and just 2.3% now.
Sir Keir has said his government will inch up defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by next year and has set an "ambition" to lift the level to 3% of GDP by the next parliament - which lasts until 2034.
However, there have been reports that he could make this move - which would cost taxpayers billions of additional pounds - by 2029, five years early.
The 56-year-old succeeds his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in his Tehran compound on the first day of the war. He was the supreme leader for more than 37 years before his death.
Mojtaba was not there, and so survived, but his mother, wife and daughter were killed.
Iran war latest live blog updates
The supreme leader is chosen by the assembly of experts, a body of 88 Islamic scholars selected for their loyalty to the regime.
A building where it meets was flattened in an airstrike, but none of them are thought to have been present at the time.
Little is known about Mojtaba Khamenei.
He is the second eldest son of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and has kept a low profile over the years, rarely speaking publicly or taking Friday prayers.
The 56-year-old is a hardline conservative who served in the Habib battalion of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s and has been linked with the violent suppression of protests in his country.
His time in the IRGC helped him build influential connections with men who now hold senior positions in the country.
Describing the new leader as a "lightweight", US President Donald Trump said: "Khamenei's son is unacceptable to me.
"We want someone that will bring harmony and peace to Iran."
Tara Kangarlou, author of The Heartbeat of Iran, told Sky News that Mojtaba Khamenei "holds a lot of power in the IRGC apparatus; he has his hands in pretty much every infrastructure you can imagine in Iran: so a lot of money, power and influence".
Khamenei is under US sanctions but has reportedly amassed a valuable empire of properties around the world, including in London.
Unlike his father, who was a well-known intellectual, a student of Persian poetry and strong orator with a following inside Iran before he became supreme leader, Khamenei does not have a strong reputation in the country.
The position of supreme leader is not just the ultimate authority in Iran, he (and it's always a man) is the guardian of the Islamic Republic.
Although Khamenei studied in the holy city of Qom, he has only ever been a mid-ranking cleric, not a senior ayatollah.
By inheriting the role, the assembly of experts has in effect created a dynasty - not unlike a monarchy.
But Iranians do not like dynasties: they overthrew the Qajar dynasty in 1925 and the Pahlavi monarchy in 1979.
Read more:
Strategy behind the US-Israeli strikes
Royal Navy destroyer will arrive too late for Cyprus
Although Khamenei has influence in the inner circles of Iranian politics, he has never held public office or been elected to any government role.
In 1989, when his father became supreme leader, he worked in his offices and became his "principal gatekeeper" and "the power behind the robes", according to US diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks.
He is close to the IRGC, and that's important because they would have been instrumental in his appointment, and it suggests the hardliners retain some power, which does not bode well for negotiations to end the war.
Dozens of trains were cancelled on Sunday after a four-storey building in Union Street, close to Glasgow Central Station, caught fire.
The building has partially collapsed, and the station will not reopen this morning.
Network Rail said the fire has been brought under control.
Several businesses said on Monday their sites have been "destroyed", while a local MSP added the damage "looks like something out of the Blitz".
A spokesperson for Network Rail said on Monday: "Glasgow Central Station remains closed following the fire in a building on Union Street on Sunday.
"While the fire is now under control, emergency services are still on site and we continue to support their response.
"The station will remain closed today and likely tomorrow. Timescales for reopening will only be confirmed once we are able to safely gain access and carry out the necessary checks.
"All services to and from Glasgow Central are currently suspended, and passengers should continue to follow alternative travel arrangements as advised by their train operators.
"We will provide further updates as soon as more information is available."
ScotRail said on its website that 15 of its 36 routes have been disrupted over the incident, with no trains calling at Glasgow Central.
First Minister John Swinney said in a post on X: "I am deeply concerned about the fire near Glasgow Central Station tonight, and very grateful to all of the emergency services who are responding.
"Please continue to follow travel guidance, avoid the area and stay safe."
'Something out of the Blitz'
Paul Sweeney, Labour MSP for Glasgow, said on X that the building - which he notes dates back to 1851 - had partially collapsed.
"I hope the fire can be contained", he added on Sunday night. "The corner of the Forsyth Building, as well as the Caledonian Chambers and Central Hotel seem unaffected.
"It's a massive blow to Union Street with the restoration of the Egyptian Halls in prospect."
On Monday morning, Mr Sweeney told BBC Radio Scotland the damage "looks like something out of the Blitz" and that there are now concerns the remainder of the building will not be viable.
"There's the cafe, there's the Blue Lagoon (fish and chip shop), of course, which is famous for many Glaswegians. It's been completely wiped out, destroyed.
"I mean the building is a gutted shell... I spoke to building control officers last night on site. They don't have much hope that the building can be saved at all.
Businesses close after site 'destroyed'
In a statement on Instagram, a shop called Sexy Coffee said its business, located inside the building, had been destroyed.
"We are absolutely devastated to confirm that the shop has sadly been destroyed in the fire," the statement said.
"It is heartbreaking for us and our team, especially after the support and loyalty we have received from so many of you over the years."
The shop added "this is not the end", and said: "We will rebuild, revamp the shop, and reopen as soon as possible.
"In the meantime, our Argyle Street branch remains open, and we would love to welcome you there.
"Thank you to all of our amazing customers for your continued support. It truly means everything to us.
The owner of Willow Hair Salon confirmed on social media that "it looks like our entire building has been burnt to the ground" after the fire on Sunday.
Annabel said that the fire ripped through the back of the building - "it's f***ed basically, the whole thing", she added - before saying all her appointments for the week are cancelled.
Read more from Sky News:
Rangers and Celtic fans in 'shameful' on-pitch clashes
Former Scotland rugby union captain stripped of MBE
A Scottish Fire and Rescue Service spokesperson said it was alerted at 3.46pm to reports of a building fire on Union Street.
"At its height, nine fire appliances and specialist resources were mobilised to the area, where firefighters are currently working to extinguish a fire affecting the ground floor of a four-storey building", the fire service said on Sunday.
In an update at 6am, a spokesperson said: "The incident has since been scaled back and nine appliances, including three high-reach vehicles, remain in attendance.
"There are no reported casualties, and crews remain at the scene."
Diane Sindall, 21, was raped and murdered by a killer dubbed the "Beast of Birkenhead" in Wirral, Merseyside, in the early hours of 2 August 1986.
For decades, investigators from Merseyside Police thought they had caught her killer: a local man called Peter Sullivan.
Mr Sullivan, 68, had always maintained his innocence, and he was freed last year after new tests showed his DNA - unearthed due to scientific advances - was not present in semen samples collected at the scene.
By the time his conviction was overturned, Mr Sullivan had spent 38 years in prison. It is the longest miscarriage of justice in UK history.
Ms Sindall's family's appeal on Crimewatch Live is their first statement since the conviction was quashed.
"Diane was 21 years old with so much to live for. She had a beautiful heart and soul, and was full of love, fun and laughter which could brighten your day," they said.
The family said Ms Sindall's loss "has been felt throughout our everyday lives with a heartache that will never heal".
"We cannot put into words what we as a family went through at the time of her death, and we are now reliving that terrible time and all that it brings once again," they added.
They urged members of the public to contact police "no matter how small or insignificant you think your information is".
Read more from Sky News:
Police try to identify man found dead in wetsuit
New appeal after woman murdered 30 years ago
Crimestoppers has offered a £20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person responsible for Ms Sindall's murder.
Detective Superintendent Rachel Wilson said Merseyside Police "will leave no stone unturned" to find Ms Sindall's killer.
"In 1986, DNA was very much in the early stages and as such was not available to the detectives who originally investigated Diane's death but her murder was fully investigated by the team," she said.
"Unfortunately, there is no match for the DNA identified on the national DNA database and we know it does not belong to any member of her family or her fiance at the time.
"We are working with the National Crime Agency, and with their support we are trying to identify the person the DNA profile belongs to, and extensive inquiries remain ongoing."