In the intensive care unit of one, four-year-old Anita lies in a coma with severe head injuries a few days after being pulled out of the rubble of her home when it was destroyed in an airstrike.

Her mother Zeiba was in torment, clutching her tiny hand and begging her to wake up. Doctors say she almost certainly never will.

Later, I asked her if she had a message for Donald Trump about this war.

"Why did this happen to us?" she said, pausing to let out her tears.

"To innocent people, my innocent four-year-old girl, who was only going downstairs to come to me, why do it to ordinary people like us?

"We were sitting together at home, they have taken away our safety, our happiness, and the health of our children."

Anita had been playing with her 14-year-old brother and was coming down the stairs, answering their mother's call, when the missile came in.

It was terrifying, he told us: "Suddenly, everywhere went black. I didn't understand what happened next. I didn't hear a sound, nothing… I thought I was dreaming."

Israel and America are calling their airstrikes precision-targeted. The term often loses most of its meaning when you see the impact on the ground.

Civilians are being hurt in the air campaign here because some airstrikes are being used on targets in residential areas. That is abundantly clear in places like Resalat in eastern Tehran.

Here, missiles have devastated a huge area the size of a city block. There was a Basij or paramilitary security force base here, say residents, but civilian apartments too, many of them.

We could see the impact of several direct hits on two apartment blocks. We met Seyed Hossein Sane, whose daughter had been at home when the missiles struck mid-afternoon. He'd been at work.

35-year-old Seyedeh Farideh's body was pulled out of the rubble and identified three days later.

Read more:
Tehran is dotted with the scars of war
Voters split on Starmer's Iran stance

Seyed had this message for the leader of whichever country sent the missiles: "I wish the same thing would happen to them that they would have to identify the body of their youth with their own hands. Them and their families.

"Same as what I did to the body of my daughter after three days, I wish that for whoever caused this."

Israelis and Americans say their airstrikes are the best way of achieving their war aims, regime change among them.

But the longer they go on, the greater the human cost and anguish.

It comes after politicians debated hundreds of amendments during multiple marathon sessions as the proposed legislation made its way through Holyrood.

The deciding Stage 3 debate and vote for the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill took place on Tuesday evening.

Final results for the vote were 57 for, 69 against and one abstention. Health Secretary Neil Gray said he would abstain earlier in the day.

The result was earlier deemed too close to call, given MSPs were permitted a free vote instead of being "whipped" or instructed along party lines.

Scottish Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur, who introduced the bill, previously said it would be the "toughest and most comprehensively safeguarded assisted dying bill in the world".

Sturgeon and Sarwar voted against bill

Speaking to Sky's Scotland correspondent Connor Gillies, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said that he did not vote in favour of the law as "I didn't feel as if there were adequate safeguards".

Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon also told Sky News "I am relieved that it hasn't passed", adding: "I just do not think any bill could provide the safeguards for the issues that most concern me.

"And the issue that most concerns me is a situation where somebody, even if it is a small number of people, feels an internal pressure to exercise a right to die.

"It becomes not a right to die, but a duty to die."

Read more:
Two terminally ill adults debate their views
'My mum wouldn't have chosen that end'

During the debate, Independent MSP Pam Duncan-Glancy, who was the first permanent wheelchair user elected to Holyrood, insisted the Bill would "put sick and disabled people at risk".

Green MSP Lorna Slater said, however, that everyone "should have the right to choose" as she recounted her father's assisted death in Canada in November 2025.

Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of the Care Not Killing campaign group, said after the vote: "We are relieved that MSPs have decided not to back this legislation.

"We believe the Bill posed serious risks to the most vulnerable in society - including disabled people and those suffering from domestic abuse."

This is the third time MSPs have considered legislation on assisted dying, with two previous attempts having failed at their first vote.

Last month, Jersey voted to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults.

It came almost a year after the Tynwald in the Isle of Man became the first parliament in the British Isles to agree a framework for assisted dying.

However, the process of getting that framework on the statute book is yet to be finalised.

Meanwhile, at Westminster, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill for England and Wales is progressing slowly through the House of Lords and is at risk of failing due to a lack of parliamentary time.

Thousands of students in Kent are being urged to get vaccines and take antibiotics as health officials deal with the "unprecedented" and "explosive" outbreak.

Some 15 cases have been reported to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) so far. All required hospital admission.

The number of cases is expected to rise because the incubation period from infection to when symptoms appear is two to 14 days.

Around 5,000 students in university halls in Kent will be offered the meningitis B (menB) vaccine in the coming days, while four schools across the county have confirmed cases and hundreds of people are being offered antibiotics.

Experts said many of those affected had attended Club Chemistry in Canterbury between 5-7 March.

UKHSA chief executive Susan Hopkins said the outbreak "looks like a super-spreader" event with "ongoing spread" through universities' halls of residence.

"There will have been some parties particularly around this, so there will have been lots of social mixing," she added.

"I can't yet say where the initial infection came from, how it's got into this cohort, and why it's created such an explosive amount of infections.

"I can say that in my 35 years working in medicine, in healthcare and hospitals, this is the most cases I've seen in a single weekend with this type of infection.

"It's the explosive nature that is unprecedented here - the number of cases in such a short space of time.

"NHS were initially managing it as a major incident in the region but they have now increased that overlay to having a national-level oversight as well."

Read more from Sky News:
What we know about top US official who resigned over Iran war
Eyewitness: The painful human cost of US-Israel airstrikes

'The quickest-growing outbreak I've ever seen in my career'

While all reported cases so far have a link to Kent, according to the UKHSA, at least one person who fell ill and had links to Kent attended a London hospital.

England's deputy chief medical officer Dr Thomas Waite said: "This is by far the quickest-growing outbreak I've ever seen in my career, and I think probably any of us have seen of meningitis for a very long time.

"Whilst it remains an outbreak that is having its consequences in Kent, it is obviously of national significance."

Scientists are urgently working to establish whether the spread is caused by a possible mutant strain of menB. Of the 15 cases reported so far, four were confirmed to have that strain.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting told MPs: "This is an unprecedented outbreak. It is also a rapidly developing situation."

He said the menB vaccine has been available on the NHS since 2015 as part of routine childhood immunisations, "but clearly most students would not be vaccinated".

Four centres are open in Canterbury offering antibiotics, with 11,000 doses available on site, Mr Streeting added.

"The onset of illness is often sudden, and early diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics are vital," he said.

The CAF Appeal Board said that Senegal is "declared to have forfeited" the final in January, which will be recorded as a 3-0 win for Morocco, the tournament hosts.

During the match at the Prince Moulay Abdellah Stadium in Rabat, Senegalese fans tried to storm the pitch and Senegal players walked off in protest after Morocco were awarded a penalty in the 98th minute.

After a lengthy delay, the players and coach returned to the pitch where the penalty was saved by Senegal's goalkeeper, and Senegal went on to win the game 1-0 in extra time.

Read more: How controversy unfolded in final

The Royal Moroccan Football Federation said after the match it would "pursue legal action", saying the walk-off "had a significant impact on the normal course of the match and on the players' performance".

FIFA boss Gianni Infantino hit out at the "unacceptable scenes on the field and in the stands" as he criticised the behaviour of some "supporters" as well as Senegal players and staff.

The Law Commission has recommended modernising laws, some of which have not been altered for more than 170 years,- to tackle a burial space shortage.

Reusing old graves is already permitted in London council cemeteries, Church of England churchyards, and some cemeteries with their own laws.

But the changes see such powers extended to other burial grounds across England and Wales.

Concerns had previously been raised about the graves of soldiers who died in the First and Second World Wars being disturbed as part of the proposed legal overhaul.

However, the commission said the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) will always be able to object.

"As a consequence, our recommended reforms to the law would result in no Commonwealth war grave ever being reused," the commission's report, published today, said.

It also recommended that, for the first time, post-war military graves that fall under the remit of the Ministry of Defence would also be protected through a right of objection.

The overall recommendations "respond directly to contemporary challenges, including the shortage of burial space", and the "complexities" that arise from Victorian-era legislation, said Professor Lisa Webley, commissioner for property, family and trust law.

Read more from Sky News:
Railway station to partially reopen after devastating fire
Stop blaming Brexit for economic woes, Reeves told

The commission recommends allowing centuries-old burial grounds, closed under Victorian laws, to be reopened, giving rise to the possibility of local parish churchyards being used for burials again.

No grave could be reused a century after the last burial - longer than the current 75 years.

Additionally, relatives would have a year to object to the reuse of a family member's grave.

Reuse could see remains currently in a grave moved deeper down, with the new remains buried above.

The commission said, however, that the remains left in a grave "must be no more than skeletal in order for the grave to be reused".

It said a relative's objection would prevent a grave being reused for another 25 years.

A new requirement for a minimum of two feet of soil above a coffin has also been proposed.

The commission said this would lead to a more consistent approach, as there is currently no law on this aspect in a lot of burial grounds.

The proposals also cover the issue of uncollected ashes, which was outlined last year by the National Association of Funeral Directors.

The trade body estimated there were up to 300,000 sets of unclaimed ashes in the UK.

It said the reasons for this are varied, from family disputes, to illness, and a desire to place two sets of ashes together.

The commission said: "Since funeral directors have no legal authority to scatter or bury them, and crematoria have no duty to accept their return, these uncollected ashes end up sitting on the shelves of funeral directors' premises indefinitely."

If the ashes remain uncollected after six months, during which attempts have been made by the funeral director to contact the family, they could - under the proposals - be returned to the cremation authority, which would have to accept them under a statutory duty.

The commission has recommended the cremation authority could charge the funeral director for the return of ashes, "at a level to be set by the government".

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "The government will carefully consider the recommendations set out in the Law Commission's report and will formally respond in due course."