Jean-Pierre Lihou, 61, was initially friends with the Reform UK leader when he arrived at Dulwich College in the 1970s, at the time when Mr Farage is accused of saying antisemitic and other racist remarks by more than a dozen pupils.

But Mr Lihou, who is half-German and said he went for a couple of sleepovers at Mr Farage's parent's house, told Sky News' Amanda Akass that it "soon become obvious he was not quite the same person I thought he was".

Warning: This article contains references to antisemitic slurs which readers may find offensive

Another former pupil, Stefan Benarroch, who was in the year below Mr Farage and is Jewish, said that Mr Farage was "not a kid" when he made alleged antisemitic remarks and his behaviour was "unacceptable in any era".

Mr Farage has said he "never directly racially abused anybody" at Dulwich and said there is a "strong political element" to the allegations coming out 49 years later. Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice has called the ex-classmates "liars".

A Reform UK spokesman accused Sky News of "scraping the barrel" and being "desperate to stop us winning the next election".

'People were hurt by it'

Mr Lihou told Sky News Mr Farage used to direct antisemitic songs at his Jewish friend Peter Ettedgui, who is one of the main former classmates to have spoken out against the Reform leader.

"He used to sing: 'Gas them all, gas them out, gas them all, into the chambers they crawl' - and the rest of those horrible words," he said.

"You think, when somebody is obviously distressed by that, why do you keep doing it? The humour wears off... when you see this, and because I'm German I'm particularly sensitive to anyone making that kind of analogy."

Mr Lihou also said Mr Farage used to "pass comment on anyone that wasn't white, particularly Indians".

He said: "He had a great big issue with anyone called Patel because I think the school had at one point more Patels than Smiths. That seemed to irk him.

"Anybody who wasn't white, he was likely to have a comment pretty much throughout my school life, especially Jewish people. I think that was the worst thing because you could obviously see that people were hurt by it."

'He was truly ghastly'

Mr Benarroch, who was also friends with Mr Ettedgui, told Sky News: "His behaviour as a teenager was unacceptable by any standards and in any era. He was truly ghastly at Dulwich College."

He said he would never have come across Mr Farage "had I not been a Jew".

"He and his minions - and one of his minions, in particular, was my tormentor at Dulwich - they would spot us coming out of Jewish prayers on a Friday," he added.

"So his behaviour at 16, 17, 18 - and you are a man at 18, you're technically an adult - was truly appalling. So we're not talking about a kid here."

The property developer said the racism allegations are "not just about Nigel Farage as a teenager, this is also about Nigel Farage as an adult".

"His behaviour as a teenager was unacceptable by any standards and in any era. He was truly ghastly at Dulwich College," he added.

'These things don't leave you'

Mr Benarroch, who is no longer a practising Jew, added: "I was terrified of his bullies, he had these guys hanging around with him who were instructed to have a go at us as these young, nice Jewish boys.

"I don't recall ever having direct contact with Nigel Farage, but certainly I was very much a witness to his tormenting of others, especially Peter Ettudgui.

"He [Mr Farage] was so extreme, these things don't leave you, they don't leave your body, as such."

On Thursday, Mr Farage launched into a tirade at the BBC after one of its reporters asked about the claims, with the politician reading out a letter he said was from someone he went to school with.

He quoted the unnamed Jewish pupil as saying there was "plenty of macho, tongue-in-cheek schoolboy banter" and said sometimes it "was offensive, but never with malice".

Read more:
Farage dismisses school racism claims as 'banter in a playground'
Farage needs to explain 'racist' comment allegations, says PM

'It was not schoolboy banter'

Mr Benarroch rejected Mr Farage's claim it was just "schoolboy banter" and said he has continued to show the same views, just in a less obvious way.

"You tell that [that it was banter] to the guys, to Peter who had 'Hitler should have gassed you' said to him," he said.

"Peter Ettedgui was tormented by Nigel Farage.

"The point I'm making is, he's a grown man now. He's a highly intelligent politician with nuance when it suits him, and so clearly he's not going around saying 'Hitler should have gassed you all', obviously."

The former Dulwich student said Mr Farage had "kept the most disgraceful company imaginable" in the US during the 2010s on radio and TV shows.

He specifically named Rick Wiles, a far-right American conspiracy theorist whose YouTube channel was banned in 2020 after calling Donald Trump's impeachment a "Jew coup".

Mr Benarroch, who said he is not part of any political party, said "there is no political motivation" behind his allegations, but accused Reform and Mr Farage of making "a political statement" by calling them liars.

On Thursday, Mr Farage said he had received multiple letters from former pupils in support of him.

He said a letter from a Jewish schoolmate, said: "While there was plenty of macho tongue-in-cheek schoolboy banter, it was humour, and yes, sometimes it was offensive... but never with malice.

"I never heard him [Farage] racially abuse anyone."

A Reform UK spokesman "accused Sky News of scraping the barrel".

He said: "This ridiculous interview has nothing to do with Nigel Farage himself but apparently someone who knew him at school almost 50 years ago.

"Sky News are desperate to stop us winning the next election."

The new 33-page document outlines an upending of American foreign policy objectives and priorities which have stood largely unchanged through different administrations stretching back decades.

The document says American strategy went "astray" over many years. It seeks to reframe America's strategic interests as being far narrower now than at any time in its modern history.

Among the key points, the document says:

• Europe faces "civilizational erasure" and could be "unrecognisable in 20 years or less"

• "Certain NATO members will become majority non-European" within a few decades

•​​​​​​​ America will "shift away" from the "burden" of the Middle East seeing it now as a "source and destination of international investment"

•​​​​​​​ In the Western hemisphere, America should pursue a policy of "enlist and expand… restoring American pre-eminence"

•​​​​​​​ In Africa, American policy focus should be on trade not "providing and spreading liberal ideology"

In black-and-white, the text articulates a dramatic strategic shift which has been playing out at lightning speed over the past year.

The document underlines the end of the concept of America as an arbiter of the democratic rules-based order.

"American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country. Yet the affairs of other countries are our concern only if their activities directly threaten our interests," the paper says.

Every US administration publishes at least one National Security Strategy during a presidential term.

The focus of this one is starkly different from that published by President Biden in 2022.

It's also notably different from the document which President Trump published during his first term. His 2017 paper cast the world as a contest between "repressive regimes" and "free societies".

This new one places the necessity to do trade above the imposition of values.

"We seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations of the world without imposing on them democratic or other social change that differs widely from their traditions and histories."

Mass migration and Europe

The new document is highly critical of mass migration.

It warns that uncontrolled migration is destroying the concept of nation states which could impact America's strategic alliances and the countries it counts as reliable allies.

The paper is particularly critical of Europe, of the European Union as a concept and of individual European nations.

"Should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less," the paper says.

It continues: "As such, it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies.

"Many of these nations are currently doubling down on their present path. We want Europe to remain European, to regain its civilizational self-confidence, and to abandon its failed focus on regulatory suffocation."

The document's language around the politics of governing parties across Europe is particularly stark.

Regarding Ukraine, the document says: "The Trump Administration finds itself at odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments, many of which trample on basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition.

"A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those government's subversion of democratic processes."

👉 Tap to follow Trump100 wherever you get your podcasts👈

The document outlines how his administration will seek to support "patriotic European parties".

This is entirely in line with President Trump's rhetoric but still represents a major departure from the longstanding principle of not interfering in the politics of allies.

It says: "American diplomacy should continue to stand up for genuine democracy, freedom of expression, and unapologetic celebrations of European nations' individual character and history.

"America encourages its political allies in Europe to promote this revival of spirit, and the growing influence of patriotic European parties indeed gives cause for great optimism."

Ukraine and Russia

On European-Russia relations, the document raises the prospect of war but curiously does not presume that such a conflict would involve America.

"Managing European relations with Russia will require significant US diplomatic engagement, both to reestablish conditions of strategic stability across the Eurasian landmass, and to mitigate the risk of conflict between Russia and European states."

Read more from Sky News:
Germany introduces controversial military service law
Netflix agrees $72bn deal for Warner Bros studios

By contrast, President Biden's National Security Strategy, published in 2022, underlined repeatedly the "iron-clad" commitment the United States had to Europe's security.

Chinese risk and opportunity

The document presents Asia and the Indo-Pacific region as a source of opportunity for strategic and economic cooperation.

"President Trump is building alliances and strengthening partnerships in the Indo-Pacific that will be the bedrock of security and prosperity long into the future…"

And specifically on China, the paper presents a goal of "economic vitality" achieved through a balanced economic relationship between the two countries combined with an "ongoing focus on deterrence to prevent war".

Deterrence would be achieved, it outlines, by maintaining preeminent military strength over China.

It says: "This combined approach can become a virtuous cycle as strong American deterrence opens up space for more disciplined economic action, while more disciplined economic action leads to greater American resources to sustain deterrence in the long term."

Hemispheres of influence

In line with President Trump's focus on spheres of influence, particular focus is given to the western hemisphere.

There are clear references to the impact of drugs from south and central America into the US and more subtle references to control of the arctic.

"The United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American pre-eminence in the Western Hemisphere, and to protect our homeland and our access to key geographies throughout the region," the paper says.

It continues: "We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our hemisphere."

Police said four protesters had been arrested following the incident just before 10am on Saturday.

They said it was reported that food had been thrown onto the case before two protesters left the scene.

Footage of the incident appears to show one demonstrator removing the large foil tray of apple crumble from a bag and slamming it against the glass.

Meanwhile, another pours a tub of bright yellow custard on the front of the case.

They then held up a sign which read "Democracy has crumbled - Tax the rich".

Police said in a statement: "Officers worked closely with City of London Police and security officers and four people have been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage. They have taken into custody.

"The Tower has been closed to the public while the police investigation continues."

The Metropolitan Police later said only the Jewel House at the Tower had been closed to the public while investigations continued.

A spokesperson for Historic Royal Palaces confirmed The Crown Jewels had not been damaged.

Take Back Power - which describes itself as a new non-violent civil resistance group - claims it was responsible.

The Imperial State Crown is built on a gold frame, with silver gem mounts housing 2868 diamonds, 269 pearls, 17 sapphires and 11 emeralds.

Fitted with a purple velvet cap and ermine band, some of the stones are famous in their own right, named the "Stuart Sapphire" and "Black Prince's Ruby".

It was originally made for King George VI in 1937, but is still used for major royal events, including the annual State Opening of Parliament.

It forms part of the Crown Jewels - a priceless collection which includes orbs, sceptres and crowns - and is considered to be the most famous of the nation's treasures.

The side's EFL Championship match against Portsmouth at The Valley, a lunchtime kick-off, was halted in the 12th minute while the supporter initially received treatment, and was subsequently postponed. The score was 0-0.

In a statement, Charlton Athletic said it was "devastated", and thanked the staff and first responders who did everything they could during the incident.

"The club are grateful to supporters in attendance and the Portsmouth players and staff for their patience and understanding as this tragedy unfolded.

"Everyone at the club sends their heartfelt condolences to the supporter's family and friends at this incredibly difficult time."

Charlton Athletic captain Greg Docherty paid tribute to the fan on X: "Absolutely devastating news… from all of the players at the club our thoughts are with his family and friends through this extremely difficult time," followed by a broken heart emoji.

Both clubs said information on when the match would be rescheduled will be announced in due course.

Portsmouth also paid tribute on its website, saying it was also "devastated".

"Our thoughts and deepest condolences are with their family and friends at this difficult time," said Portsmouth in a statement on their website.

The EFL posted on X: "Our deepest condolences go out to the supporter's family, friends and all @CAFCofficial at this incredibly difficult time," followed by a love heart emoji.

Sudan Doctors' Network says paramedics on the scene in the town of Kalogi were also targeted by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in a "second unexpected attack".

Rights group Emergency Lawyers reported a "third civilian site" near the previous two attacks was also targeted.

The death toll is expected to be higher, but communication blackouts have made it difficult to confirm the full number of casualties.

Emergency Lawyers says the strikes are a "flagrant violation of international humanitarian law, including the protection of civilians, especially children, and vital civilian infrastructure."

UNICEF has urged both parties to stop the attacks immediately and allow safe access for humanitarian aid.

"Killing children in their school is a horrific violation of children's rights," said UNICEF representative for Sudan Sheldon Yett.

"Children should never pay the price of conflict."

Read more from Sky News
RSF says it has captured Babanusa in West Kordofan
Sudan 'epicentre of suffering in the world'
Sudan's paramilitary forces agree to US-led humanitarian ceasefire proposal

The attack on the nursery is among the latest in the two-year conflict between the RSF and Sudan's military, where the focus has recently shifted to the oil-rich Kordofan states.

Hundreds of civilians have been killed in the last few weeks as fighting shifted from Darfur, following the RSF's violent takeover of the city of Al Fashir, which was marked with civilians being executed, rapes, sexual assaults and other atrocities.

Thousands managed to escape the violence, but thousands more are trapped or feared killed.

Meanwhile, Sudanese military aerial strikes last weekend killed at least 48 people, mostly civilians, in South Kordofan.

The RSF has also accused the military of carrying out a drone strike on the border with Chad, posting a video showing billowing black smoke.

The Associated Press has been unable to verify the video or whether there were any casualties, while Sudan's military also hasn't commented.

The RSF and the Sudanese military have been fighting for power over the country since 2023, which has seen more than 40,000 people killed, according to the World Health Organisation, although the real death toll is expected to be higher. 12 million people have been displaced.