Time has even been spent inside the Ministry of Defence (MoD) quibbling over the name of a new organisation charged with procuring billions of pounds worth of weapons - despite war gripping both the Middle East and Ukraine, and Donald Trump mocking British military weakness.
Two sources said some people would like to rename the newly established National Armaments Director Group, or NAD Group, as the Royal Armaments Directorate.
One of the sources claimed this was in part because the abbreviation "NAD" also means testicle - an unfortunate source of amusement. The other source said it was because the word "royal" would engender a greater sense of pride.
"If they're worried about that, then something has gone so badly wrong," said Air Marshal Ed Stringer, a former senior officer who was involved initially with helping John Healey craft his "defence reform" initiative.
The MoD signalled there is no plan to change the name.
In another example of teething problems, an attempt to inform by email around 27,000 defence staff late last month about who they will report to within the NAD Group had to be paused after the initial batch of notifications went out.
This was because of inaccuracies in the information.
An investigation was launched to find out what went wrong.
Emails with the correct details about reporting structures have yet to be issued even though the NAD Group became fully operational on 1 April.
"The formation of the NAD Group has turned into a fiasco," one of the defence sources said, sharing their views on condition of anonymity.
There is "lots of ill feeling among the civil servants. No one has confidence any of this is working. Lots of workshops happening - little meaningful action".
Compounding the sense of dysfunction is a failure by the MoD to publish a long-promised plan for what equipment - from warships, tanks and jets to drones, satellites and other emerging technology - the department will buy over the next 10 years.
The Defence Investment Plan should have been released last autumn following the publication of a Strategic Defence Review, which set out the UK's military ambitions.
A Whitehall source said it might be out in June but there is no guarantee.
The delay is understood to be largely because of the need for more money to be made available faster by the Treasury.
If that is not granted, then difficult choices on cutting programmes will have to be taken - even as Sir Keir Starmer says the military is moving to a war footing.
"There is a gap of billions of pounds just to deliver the programme of record," a defence industry source with knowledge of deliberations at the MoD said.
"It is so broken inside."
An MoD spokesperson strongly rejected what they called "incorrect" criticism of Mr Healey's reform agenda.
"In an ever-changing world where demands on defence are growing, our reform programme represents the biggest shake-up of UK defence for over 50 years and one of the fastest transformation programmes in government," the spokesperson said in a statement.
Mr Healey made defence reform a priority before he became defence secretary in July 2024, saying it was vital to fix structural problems and "create a stronger defence centre, capable of leading Britain in meeting the increasing threats we must face".
His vision was to establish a Military Strategic Headquarters (MSHQ) under the chief of the defence staff, charged with deciding - in an integrated way - the strategy for how the army, navy and air force would fight and what kind of capabilities they would need.
These "demand signals" would then be passed to another of his key creations - the NAD Group - which would go to industry to find the right weapons and put them under contract.
The NAD Group is meant to be an influential, strategic body that oversees the procurement and through-life support of military kit as well as forging closer ties with industry, encouraging innovation and supporting exports.
It sits above Defence, Equipment and Support (DE&S) - which is the procurement arm of the MoD - as well as other areas such as Defence Digital and Defence Science and Technology Laboratories.
On paper, this whole model is a change from a previous structure - which itself was the product of yet another revamp back in 2011 - that had given the heads of the navy, army and RAF the ability to spend their own budgets on the equipment they thought they required.
However, during that period - and over prior decades - programmes to buy equipment were often delayed because of onerous contracting procedures and modifications to the order.
There was also the impact of repeated budget squeezes, which would force a project to be slowed down to save money in-year - while pushing up total costs over time.
As a result, despite having one of the largest defence budgets in the world at more than £60bn a year and rising, the Royal Navy is still struggling to deploy a single warship and attack submarine, the army could not muster a credible division of 10,000-20,000 troops for any meaningful length of time and the RAF lacks sufficient pilots, jets and munitions to sustain a high intensity fight against a peer enemy that lasts longer than a few days.
"It is a mess," a serving military officer said, speaking anonymously.
Procurement minister Luke Pollard is understood to be planning a review to "stop stupid rules" across defence in a sign of the moves that are under way to change a culture of risk aversion and bureaucracy - though nothing seems to be happening very quickly.
Multiple defence sources said Mr Healey and his team have instead struggled to make their reforms significantly transform defence's output in almost two years of trying - an effort that is thought to have cost some £20m in consultancy fees.
That is on top of tens of millions of pounds that were already spent under the previous government on a now-abandoned attempt to achieve the same objective of improving how the MoD functions and to accelerate the procurement of weapons.
"The mood is dreadful," the defence source said.
"Within the groups that make up the NAD Group there is just a sense of paralysis."
The source said many of the senior officials who had presided over the old way of working that the defence secretary had wanted to scrap have now been tasked with implementing his reforms - just under different job titles and working within new structures.
"So the people who have been entrusted to reform are the ones who have presided over disastrous, slow and bureaucratic procurement for decades," the source said.
A defence industry source, also speaking anonymously, agreed, saying: "It is reform theatrics. We have the same people in similar jobs just under a different label."
Ken McNaught, a defence acquisition specialist and systems engineer, has tracked similar attempts to reform defence procurement since 1961.
"Nothing will change until they change the culture - and the super tanker is not for turning," he said.
Offering a sense of the slow pace of reform, the pivotal role of national armaments director, who heads the NAD Group, was only appointed last September - more than a year after Mr Healey took charge and despite the importance he had personally placed on transformation.
After a lengthy recruitment process, the government appointed a former corporate lawyer with a background in venture capitalism called Rupert Pearce to the top job. He once ran the satellite communications firm Inmarsat but has not led a defence company.
"He's been dealt a bad hand," the defence source said.
"He seems a smart guy but he's yet to prove he can make things happen in the civil service and MoD. There is good talk but little action."
Defence ministers continue to champion their reforms.
The MoD spokesperson said: "Our increased defence spending is being matched by sustained and serious reform, which is already producing results.
"This includes clearer accountability at every level within the department, ensuring that defence delivers for the British people, a new national armaments director, who is fixing procurement and driving growth, and senior leadership who are cutting waste, reducing duplication and ensuring that we are buying better for what our front-line forces need."
Ministers also insist that the delay in the publication of the investment plan has not stopped the NAD Group from issuing contracts for warfighting kit such as drones and helicopters.
Yet the mood within much of the defence industry is described by insiders as "bleak", with order books empty as companies wait for work from Mr Pearce and his contracting team.
"I am twiddling my thumbs trying to find something to do and trying to justify my existence," said one defence industry employee.
"I half expect to lose my job. We keep on being told the money is coming, but until it does, then it is not there and we can't get to work."
Some firms are even at risk of going bust or being forced to move overseas. Germany and the US are investing far more decisively in defence than the UK.
Fred Sugden is associate director, defence and national security, at techUK, the main trade association for the UK technology industry, which includes defence companies.
"Whatever the challenges are, and we understand there are challenges around government spending at the moment, now is not the time to be delaying," he said, referring to the publication of the defence investment plan.
"We're going to potentially lose good UK companies to other nations and ultimately we can lose military capabilities because they're underpinned by defence industry. If you haven't got a defence industry, then you haven't got military capabilities that you might need to deploy."
Read more:
Russian submarines targeted UK cables, Healey says
Diesel and jet fuel shortages for some time, IMF warns
A number of military officers and defence officials cautioned that taxpayer money risks again being spent badly unless the MoD is forced to function better.
A commander, speaking anonymously, said: "If you lifted defence spending to 5% of GDP tomorrow [up from around 2.3% now], you would not see a step change in output."
It is why Mr Healey's desire to reform the MoD made sense to Air Marshal Stringer and to others who Sky News has spoken to who have knowledge of the reform programme.
But they said that is only true if the change is properly implemented, which involves much more than altering job titles and workflows.
They said it requires a transformation of the culture inside the department to be more agile, dynamic and bold - as already happens when the MoD procures weapons for Ukraine.
Asked what the risk is if the MoD fails to become better at procuring the right weapons at speed and scale for the armed forces, Air Marshal Stringer said: "You're going to the next war with the old stuff, and you'll suddenly find that you can't dictate the terms of the conflict because the enemy gets a vote. And you'll find, pretty quickly on, you're taking casualties."
Sky News is the official media partner of the London Defence Conference 2026. Later this year Sky News will launch a new defence & security app, bringing together video-first reporting from our leading journalists and experts.
Mr Gabbana stepped down as chairman in January, according to a company filing with the local chamber of commerce, though he will continue in his creative role at the company.
Money blog: Three banks paying out £40 compensation over app glitch
His resignation came "as part of a natural evolution of its organisational structure and governance", the fashion house said.
"These resignations have no impact whatsoever on the creative activities carried out by Stefano Gabbana on behalf of the group."
Replacing Mr Gabbana is Alfonso Dolce, the brother of co-founder Domenico Dolce and the current D&G chief executive. He took over the role in January, according to Bloomberg, which first reported news of Mr Gabbana's resignation.
The Italian company has been squeezed by an ongoing slowdown in the luxury goods sector, compounded recently by uncertainties from the Iran war.
Mr Gabbana was present at D&G's last runway show in February, with their longtime muse Madonna as a front-row guest.
Both he and Mr Dolce greeted Madonna personally at her seat after the show and brought her backstage.
An iconic brand
D&G was formed in 1985 by Domenico Dolce and Mr Gabbana, who remained its creative leaders.
The brand grew in popularity in the 1990s with cone bras, corset looks and tailored black dresses.
The designers have often drawn on Mr Dolce's Sicilian roots, with sheer materials and netting for menswear and bright floral and fruit prints and jewellery with oversized crosses.
They also expanded into fragrance, home goods and watches.
Cleveland Police said a three-month-old girl died in the Dormanstown area of Redcar on Thursday.
Armed officers who arrived at a property soon after 1.30pm destroyed a dog they found on the street. A second dog, which was recovered at the address by police, has since been put down.
A woman, 31, was treated in hospital for an arm injury after also being bitten.
The dogs were "deemed not to be a prohibited type of dog", the force said.
"An investigation into the girl's death is ongoing, and at this stage officers are treating it as a result of a dog bite," said police in a statement.
A 45-year-old man, who was arrested on suspicion of being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control, causing injury resulting in death, has been released on conditional bail after being questioned.
Read more from Sky News:
Man jailed after grooming 14-year-old girl on Roblox gaming app
British man in court for leading fighters in Somalia terror group
Chief Superintendent Rachel Stockdale, head of local policing at Cleveland Police, said it was a "tragic and distressing" incident, adding that their thoughts "continue to be with the child's family".
CS Stockdale asked that their privacy be respected, adding there would be "a scene in place at the property alongside a visible policing presence as the investigation is ongoing".
Police have appealed for anyone with "information, mobile or doorbell and dashcam footage to get in touch".
A North East Ambulance Service spokesperson said three ambulance crews, one clinical team leader and one duty officer were sent to the incident.
Dilshad Shamo, 43, and Ali Khdir, 42, helped transport hundreds of people to Europe from Iraq, Iran and Syria.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) said migrants were offered three tiers of service: the cheapest in the back of a lorry or by foot; the next offering travel by cargo ship or yacht; and the top by providing plane travel.
Payment was handled in Iraq and Turkey by bankers using the Hawala system - an informal transfer method that works outside the normal banking system.
The pair even got migrants to film videos on their way to Europe and used the positive "reviews" as adverts on social media.
Shamo and Khdir communicated with other smugglers in the larger network via WhatsApp.
Prosecutors said they helped transport at least 409 people in just six months in what the NCA called a "round-the-clock" operation.
The men - who had a car wash business in Caerphilly - were arrested in Newport in 2023 after an NCA operation supported by Gwent Police.
They initially pleaded not guilty, but on day 10 of their trial at Cardiff Crown Court in November 2024, they pleaded guilty to five counts of conspiring to breach immigration laws.
The same court today sentenced them to 19 years each.
"While on the surface they portrayed themselves as successful businessmen running a car wash from Caerphilly, they were actually leading an entirely separate life as part of a criminal network," said NCA branch commander Derek Evans.
Read more from Sky News:
Domestic abuser jailed in landmark case after wife took own life
The Norwegian soldiers preparing for Russian invasion
The Crown Prosecution Service said they claimed to have helped only a handful of people, mainly friends and relatives, and weren't out to make money.
"We didn't accept the basis on which Ali Khdir and Dilshad Shamo admitted their guilt because they tried to minimise their leading role in seeking to bring hundreds of migrants illegally into Europe," said Kate Hurst from the CPS.
"The court accepted our evidence and has handed down sentences that they both deserve."
Bambaataa, best known for tracks like his 1982 global hit Planet Rock, and for founding the Universal Zulu Nation art collective, died in Pennsylvania, Naf Management Entertainment said on Tuesday.
In its statement on Instagram, Naf said hip-hop would "never be the same without him".
The company added: "Everything hip hop is today, it is because of him. His spirit lives in every beat, every cypher and every corner of this globe he touched."
Born Lance Taylor in 1957, Bambaataa, of Jamaican and Barbadian heritage, was brought up in The Bronx, New York City, by his mother, whose record collection inspired his early love of music.
A fan of Kool Herc, who is often considered the father of hip-hop, he began experimenting with re-mixing old hits as a DJ in the early 1970s, he said in an interview in 1998.
His fame grew through the decade, and into the 1980s with the popularity of the genre, leading to the release of a series of electro tracks that helped shape hip-hop and electro-funk.
Bambaataa was also one of the first DJs to use beat breaks, incorporating the iconic Roland TR-808 drum machine.
He put his success down to rapid-fire changes in what he was playing, saying that, while "other DJs would play they great records for 15, 20 minutes. We was changing ours every minute or two. I couldn't have no breakbeat go longer than a minute or two".
Read more on Sky News:
How Scottish rap duo fooled the industry
Sean Combs case back in court
He later set up the Zulu Nation art collective, whose name he changed to Universal Zulu Nation to signal the inclusion of "all people from the planet earth".
In 2016, Ronald Savage, a former music industry executive, accused Bambaataa of abusing him in 1980, when Savage was a young teen, saying: "I was scared, but at the same time I was like, 'this is Afrika Bambaataa'."
Bambaataa vehemently denied the claims, but other men made similar allegations.
In June 2016, the Universal Zulu Nation publicly apologised to "the survivors of apparent sexual molestation by Bambaataa", saying that some members of the group knew about the alleged abuse, but "chose not to disclose" it.