An investigation into NHS maternity services is under way after a series of shocking scandals.
The National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation (NMNI) is being led by Baroness Amos, who said "nothing prepared her" for the amount of "unacceptable care" families currently receive.
A report has been released documenting her initial reflections and impressions after meeting families and visiting hospitals.
She will investigate 12 NHS trusts in total, including Oxford University Hospitals (OUH), which runs the world-renowned John Radcliffe Hospital.
'I was left in my own blood'
Rebecca Matthews formed a campaign for families failed by OUH after her own traumatic births.
Asked to discuss the care she received, she said she "could only describe it as callous".
"There wasn't any kindness there. I was left in my own blood," she added.
Ms Matthews recently took part in evidence-gathering sessions held by Baroness Amos.
But when she read her interim report, she said it was "disappointing", as it appeared to be "a bullet point list of failings that actually we've seen time and time again in independent reviews".
"The reflections don't mention accountability at all," she said.
'Why are we struggling to provide?'
Based on her initial inquiries, Baroness Amos found common themes, including women not being listened to and being "disregarded" when they raised concerns.
Many weren't given the right information to make informed choices about their care.
She was told of discrimination against women of colour, working-class mothers, or parents who were younger.
A "staggering" 748 recommendations have been made about NHS maternity services in recent years, Baroness Amos revealed - and she does "not understand why change has been so slow".
She asked: "Why are we in England still struggling to provide safe, reliable maternity and neonatal care everywhere in the country?"
The most recent health watchdog findings paint a depressing picture of maternity services.
Almost two-thirds of acute hospital maternity services were judged either inadequate or required improvement for safety.
Read more from Sky News:
Three women describe traumatic childbirth
This investigation is long overdue and isn't due to report back fully until the spring.
But some campaigners are already worried it won't bring meaningful change to maternity services.
Ms Matthews said it "seems as though it's heading the same way that other reviews have gone in the past, leading to some recommendations but no teeth".
"We need some mechanisms that are going to hold people and systems to account," she said.
'More to do'
OUH chief nurse Yvonne Christley said in a statement that "feedback received from patients using our maternity service over the last year is positive overall".
"However, we know we have more to do to improve our maternity services," she added.
"Our present focus is on listening to the experiences of women and families, which is helping us to identify opportunities for improvement."
Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.
Quite the opposite.
Ukraine's military chief says Vladimir Putin is instead using the US president's focus on peace negotiations as "cover" while Russian soldiers attempt to seize more land.
That means much greater pressure on the Ukrainian frontline, even as Russian and American, or American and Ukrainian, or Ukrainian and European, leaders shake hands and smile for cameras before retreating behind closed doors in Moscow, Alaska, and London.
Putin's not counting on peace
The lack of any indicators that the Kremlin is looking to slow its military machine down also makes the risk of war spreading beyond Ukraine's borders increasingly likely.
It takes a huge amount of effort, time, and money to put a country on a war footing as Putin has done, partially mobilising his population, allocating huge portions of government spending to the military and realigning Russia's vast industrial base to produce weapons and ammunition.
But when the fighting stops, it requires almost as much focus and energy to switch a society back to a peace time rhythm.
Deliberately choosing not to dial defence down once the battles cease means a nation will continue to grow its armed forces and weapons stockpiles - a sure sign that it has no intention of being peaceful and is merely having a pause before going on the attack again.
The absence of any preparations by Moscow to slow the tempo of its military operations in Ukraine - where it has more than 710,000 troops deployed along a 780-mile frontline - is perhaps an indicator that Putin is anticipating more not less war.
How could the war end?
What happens next in Europe will depend on the content of any peace deal on Ukraine.
An all-out Russian defeat is all but impossible to conceive without a significant change of heart by the Trump White House and a massive increase in weapons and support.
The next best result for Ukraine would be a settlement that seeks to strike a fair balance between the warring sides and their conflicting objectives.
This could be done by pausing the fighting along the current line of contact before substantive peace talks then take place, with Ukraine's sovereignty supported by solid security guarantees from Europe and the US.
But such a move would require Europe's NATO allies, led by the UK, France and Germany, genuinely to switch their respective militaries and populations back to a wartime footing, with a credible readiness to go to war should Moscow attempt to test their support of Ukraine.
Will Starmer level with the public?
That does not just mean increased spending on defence at a much faster rate - in the UK at least - than is currently planned. It is also about the mindset of a country and its willingness to take some pain.
France is already openly saying that parents may have to lose their children in a war with Russia, while Germany is requiring all 18-year-old men to undergo medical checks for possible national service.
No such tough but frank conversation is being attempted by Sir Keir Starmer with the British public.
The furthest his military chief has gone is to say "warfighting readiness" is his top priority.
But that is meaningless jargon for most of the public. Being ready for war is about so much more than what the professional armed forces can do.
Armies fight battles. Countries fight wars.
Read more:
UK unveils undersea tech
Navy chief offers chilling warning
Does Britain's threat to Russia ring hollow?
Worst case scenario?
The other alternative when it comes to Ukraine is a scenario that sees a sidelined Europe unable to influence the outcome of the negotiations and Kyiv forced to agree to terms that favour Moscow.
This would include the surrender of land in the Donbas that is still under Ukrainian control.
Such a deal - even if tolerated by Ukraine, which is unimaginable without serious unrest - would likely only mean a temporary halt in hostilities until Putin or whoever succeeds him decides to try again to take the rest of Ukraine, or maybe even test NATO's borders by moving against the Baltic States.
With Trump's new national security strategy making clear the US would only intervene to defend Europe if such a move is in America's interests, it is no longer certain that the guarantees contained in NATO's founding Article 5 principle - that an attack on one member state is an attack on all - can be relied upon.
To have a sense of how a war with Russia might play out without the US on NATO's side, Sky News and Tortoise ran a wargame that simulates a Russian attack on the UK.
In the scenario, Washington does not come to Britain's defences, which leaves the British side with very few options to respond short of a nuclear strike.
Should that happen, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins said it would be the first time since the end of the Second World War that Britain's warships and submarines were not the dominant force in their most vital sea lanes alongside their allies.
"We are holding on, but not by much," he told a conference in London on Monday.
"There is no room for complacency. Our would-be opponents are investing billions. We have to step up, or we will lose that advantage."
As a senior, serving military officer speaking publicly, he did not make any direct criticism of the speed of plans by Sir Keir Starmer's government to increase defence spending.
But Sky News has reported that he and his fellow chiefs held a "very difficult meeting" last month over how to fund plans to rebuild the armed forces amid fears of further cuts.
Defence sources said there was growing concern at the very top of the armed forces about a gap between the promises being made by the prime minister to fix the UK's hollowed-out defences and the reality of the size of the defence budget, which is currently not seen as growing fast enough.
That means either billions of additional pounds must be found more quickly, or ambitions to modernise and transform the armed forces might need to be curbed, despite warnings of mounting threats from Russia and China, and pressure from Donald Trump on allies to spend more on their own defences.
A Sky News and Tortoise podcast series called The Wargame tracks the hollowing out of the UK's military since the end of the Cold War and the risk that has created.
👉Search for The Wargame on your podcast app👈
General Jenkins, the first Royal Marine to serve as First Sea Lord, used a speech at the Sea Power Conference to say that Russia is still investing billions in its naval capabilities - in particular the Northern Fleet that operates in the Atlantic - even as it wages war against Ukraine.
There has been a 30% increase in Russian incursions in the North Atlantic in the past two years, he said.
That included the Yantar spy ship, which last month was spotted off the coast of Scotland and even shone a laser at the pilots of a Royal Air Force reconnaissance plane that was tracking the vessel.
Yet General Jenkins said what Russia is doing beneath the surface of the waves, where the UK and its allies store vital communications cables as well as critical oil and gas pipelines, was even more concerning.
"I can also tell you today that the advantage that we have enjoyed in the Atlantic since the end of the Second World War is at risk," he said.
Read more:
UK unveils undersea tech
Does Britain's threat to Russia ring hollow?
Navy facing huge challenges
It is a particularly tough time for the navy, which has more ships and submarines alongside and unable to operate than at sea or at least ready to sail.
The service is also suffering from a shortage of sailors and in particular submariners, which again is impacting the availability of the fleet.
The crisis follows decades of funding cuts since the end of the Cold War, compounded by a litany of botched procurement programmes that has all too often seen vessels coming into service years late, at an inflated price and in too few numbers.
Vision of 'hybrid navy'
Despite the sombre tone, the First Sea Lord set out how he wants to transform his service and make it ready to fight a war - though not until 2029, a timeline that could be too slow if some predictions about the threat posed by Russia to NATO are correct.
His vision - working with industry and other allies - is about developing a blend of manned ships and submarines as well as unmanned ones - a "hybrid navy".
He is also stripping back what he called the navy's own bureaucracies to enable the service to move much faster - crucially at the pace of the threat and the pace of rapid and growing technological change.
"We will face headwinds, we will face rough seas, but together, we can solve these problems if we have the appetite, if we have the determination, and if we have the mindset."
The compensation - 2.9m yuan (£307,571) for each family - is for the death of loved ones, funeral expenses and damages for emotional distress, the court said.
Passengers on board have never been found, but they have been declared legally dead.
MH370 mysteriously vanished on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in 2014, leading to a series of unsuccessful searches.
Most of the passengers were Chinese, with families in China continuing to seek answers.
The court added that a further 23 cases remain pending, with agreements reached in 47 other cases and lawsuits withdrawn.
Last week, the Malaysian government said a search for the plane would resume on 30 December.
'Good night, Malaysian three seven zero'
Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah signed off the plane's last transmission with "good night, Malaysian three seven zero" around 40 minutes into take off, as it flew into Vietnamese airspace.
But the plane's transponder ceased to operate shortly after as air traffic controllers lost contact.
Radar showed it took a left turn across the Peninsular Malaysia, with investigators then believing it crashed into the Indian Ocean west of Australia.
Read more:
Partner of MH370 passenger believes there was 'intentional' cover up
Flight MH370 debris suggests pilot lowered landing gear and crashed
Small pieces of debris from the jet, which was carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew when it vanished, have since washed up.
In 2020, former Australian prime minister Tony Abbott claimed that from "very, very early on" the "very top levels" of the Malaysian government believed Mr Shah crashed the plane on purpose.
But investigators are unable to determine what happened without finding the plane.
"Ghost" plates can't be read properly - often due to a reflective spray or coating - and researchers say as many as one in 15 vehicles could be evading automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras.
ANPR uses infrared light to check plates against a database. They can highlight a car without insurance, for example, or identify one linked to high-level crime.
They're also used in London's controversial ULEZ zone and to police average speed zones.
But the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Transport Safety (APPGTS), which produced the report, said avoiding ANPR sometimes only requires "nothing more sophisticated than cellophane, leaves, or a marker pen".
So-called 3D and 4D plates - which have raised lettering - should also be banned to ensure legibility, said the MPs - and cloned plates are also highlighted as a serious problem.
This involves people finding a vehicle of the same model and colour as their own, copying the plate and using it to mask illegal activity.
The APPGTS said many plate sellers are working from private homes or workshops with no background checks and some have convictions for fraud and violence.
It wants the number of licensed sellers "significantly" reduced from the current 34,455 by bringing in higher standards and a more expansive annual fee.
'Explosive report lays threat bare'
"This explosive report lays bare the threat posed by ghost and cloned plates," said APPGTS member Sarah Coombes MP.
She said the current system means people "can commit terrible crimes and then set themselves up as number plate sellers with no questions asked".
"Those selling these illegal plates have gone under the radar for too long," Ms Coombes added.
The RAC's head of policy, Simon Williams, agreed "widespread abuse of number plates" needs dealing with.
"Ghost and cloned plates have no place on our roads as no one should be able to drive a vehicle that's invisible to enforcement cameras or untraceable by the police," he said.
"It's vital we introduce new, higher security standards for number plates and those who produce them."
Read more from Sky News:
Storm Bram: 'Danger to life' warning issued
Royal Navy chief gives stark warning
The DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency) said sellers already have to be registered and there are "robust identification standards for buyers".
It added: "DVLA works with police and Trading Standards to enforce these strict rules and anyone caught driving with illegal number plates can face up to two years in prison."
The DVLA said a review of number plate standards is currently ongoing with the aim of banning designs that evade ANPR.
The British Number Plate Manufacturers' Association said it fully supports the report's recommendations.